Army Military Munitions Response Program. 2011. Munitions Response Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study Guidance.

DDESB (Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board). 2016. Minimum Qualifications for Personnel Conducting Munitions and Explosives of Concern-Related Activities. https://safety.army.mil/Portals/0/Documents/ON-DUTY/EXPLOSIVESSAFETY/Standard/DDESB-Tech-Paper_18-Minimum-Qualifications-for-Personnel-Conducting-Munitions-and-Explosives-of-Concern-Related-Activities_1September2016.pdf?ver=2016-12-19-150211-313

DOD 2012. Department of Defense Manual Number 4715.20, Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) Management. https://www.denix.osd.mil/derp/home/

Department of the Navy (DON). In Progress. Department of the Navy’s Environmental Restoration Program Manual.

ESTCP (Environmental Security Technology Certification Program). 2014. “Geophysical System Verification.” http://www.serdp-estcp.org/Featured-Initiatives/Munitions-Response-Initiatives/Geophysical-System-Verification

Hammer, M. 2001. The Agenda. New York: Crown Business.

IDQTF (Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force). 2012. Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans. Optimized UFP-QAPP Worksheets. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/ufp_qapp_worksheets.pdf

IDQTF. 2014. Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans. Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (UFP-QAPP).

IDQTF. 2016. Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans Template: Advanced Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response (AGC-QAPP). https://www.epa.gov/fedfac/uniform-federal-policy-quality-assurance-project-plans-template-advanced-geophysical

IDQTF. 2018. Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans Munitions Response QAPP Toolkit. Module 1: Remedial Investigation (RI)/Feasibility Study (FS)-(MR-QAPP).

IOS (International Organization for Standardization). Quality Management. ISO 9001. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-standards/iso_9000.htm

IOS. General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39883

ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council). 2000. Breaking Barriers to the Use of Innovative Technologies: State Regulatory Role in Unexploded Ordnance Detection and Characterization Technology Selection. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/UXO-1.pdf

ITRC. 2003. Technical/Regulatory Guideline for Munitions Response Historical Records Review. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/UXO-2.pdf

ITRC. 2004. Geophysical Prove-Outs for Munitions Response Projects. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/UXO-3.pdf

ITRC. 2006. Survey of Munitions Response Technologies. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/UXO-4.pdf

ITRC. 2008. Quality Considerations for Munitions Response Projects. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/UXO-5.pdf

ITRC. 2010. Frequently Asked Questions about Wide-Area Assessment for Munitions Response Projects. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/UXO-6.pdf

ITRC. 2012. Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response: Introductory Fact Sheet. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://itrcweb.org/Documents/Team-Resources-GCMR/GCMR_FactSheet1.pdf

ITRC. 2013. Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response: Technical Fact Sheet. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://itrcweb.org/Documents/Team-Resources-GCMR/ITRC-MR-technical-fact-sheet-June-2013-FINAL.pdf

ITRC. 2014. Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response: Regulatory Fact Sheet. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://itrcweb.org/Documents/Team-Resources-GCMR/ITRC-GCMR-Team-Regulatory-Fact-Sheet-Final-10-10-2014.pdf

ITRC. 2015. Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response: Guidance Document. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Team. https://www.itrcweb.org/gcmr-2/

NAVFAC (Naval Facilities Engineering Command). In Progress. Draft NAVFAC Munitions Response Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Guidance.

NAVFAC. 2017. NAVFAC Munitions Response Quality Assessment Spreadsheet.

Ramsey, C.A., and Hewitt, A.D. 2005. A methodology for assessing sample representativeness. Environmental Forensics 6:71-75.

Ramsey, M.H., and Ellison, S.L.R. 2007. Eurachem/EUROLAB/CITAC/Nordtest/AMC guide: measurement uncertainty arising from sampling: a guide to methods and approaches. Eurachem ISBN:978 0 948926 26 6.

USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers). 2015. Engineer Manual EM-200-1-15 Environmental Quality- Technical Guidance for Military Munitions Response Actions http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_200-1-15.pdf

USACE. 2012. Engineer Manual EM-200-1-12 Environmental Quality- Conceptual Site Models http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_200-1-12.pdf

USACE. 2009. United States Army Military Munitions Response Program, Munitions response Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Guidance. https://aec.army.mil/application/files/8114/9512/9332/Guidance__MMRP_RIFS_2009.pdf

USACE. 2008. Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Manual EM 385-1-97 Explosives Safety and Health Requirements Manual.http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_385-1-97.pdf?ver=2013-10-21-153957-937

USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1988. Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA, Interim Final, EPA/540/G-89/004. https://rais.ornl.gov/documents/GUIDANCE.PDF

USEPA. 2001a. D. M. Crumbling. EPA, Technology Innovation Office. Current Perspectives in Site Remediation and Monitoring, Clarifying DQO Terminology Usage to Support Modernization of Site Cleanup Practice. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/134502.pdf

USEPA. 2001d. Crumbling, D., C. Groenjes, B. Lesnik, K. Lynch, J. McKenna, J. Shockley, J. J. van Ee, R. Howe, and L. Keith. Managing Uncertainty in Environmental Decisions. Environmental Science and Technology 35(19):404A-409A.

USEPA. 2006. Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process, EPA QA/G-4. EPA/240/B-01/002.

USEPA. 2016. Superfund Community Involvement Handbook. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/100000070.pdf