Skip to main content
Quality Considerations for Multiple Aspects of Munitions Response Sites
Navigating this Website
1 Introduction
1 Introduction Overview
1.1 About this Guidance
1.2 Resources and Planned Updates
1.3 About Munitions Response Projects
2 Quality Concepts
3 Evidence-Based Decisions
3 Evidence-Based Decisions Overview
3.1 Types of Evidence
3.2 Conceptual Site Model
3.3 Systematic Planning: USEPA Data Quality Objective Process
3.4 Uncertainty
4 Project Responsibilities
4 Project Responsibilities Overview
4.1 Project Delivery Team
4.2 Lead DOD Agency
4.3 Lead Regulatory Agency
4.4 MR Contractor
5 Project Phase
5 Project Phases Overview
5.1 PA/SI
5.2 RI/FS
5.3 Remedial Action
5.4 Example DQO
6 QC and Documentation
6 QC and Documentation Overview
6.1 Geophysical System Verification
6.2 QC Acceptance Requirements
6.3 Accreditation and Other Considerations
6.4 UFP-QAPP and Documentation
7 Acquiring Geophysical Data
7 Acquiring Geophysical Data Overview
7.1 Site Preparation
7.2 Geophysical Survey
7.3 Intrusive Investigation
8 Stakeholder Perspectives
8 Stakeholder Perspectives Overview
8.1 Community Involvement Plan
8.2 Using Public Service Announcements and the Media
8.3 Maintain Updated Stakeholder Notification and Communications
9 Case Studies
9 Case Studies Overview
9.1 Case Study 1: AGC Lessons Learned at the former Camp San Luis Obispo
9.2 Example Case Study 2: Soil Processing
Training Video
Additional Information
Appendix A. Root Cause Analysis/Corrective Action Process Summary
Acronyms
Glossary
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback
Quality Considerations for Multiple Aspects of Munitions Response Sites
HOME
Training Video