Skip to main content
Quality Considerations for Multiple Aspects of Munitions Response Sites
Navigating this Website
1 Introduction
1 Introduction Overview
1.1 About this Guidance
1.2 Resources and Planned Updates
1.3 About Munitions Response Projects
2 Quality Concepts
3 Evidence-Based Decisions
3 Evidence-Based Decisions Overview
3.1 Types of Evidence
3.2 Conceptual Site Model
3.3 Systematic Planning: USEPA Data Quality Objective Process
3.4 Uncertainty
4 Project Responsibilities
4 Project Responsibilities Overview
4.1 Project Delivery Team
4.2 Lead DOD Agency
4.3 Lead Regulatory Agency
4.4 MR Contractor
5 Project Phase
5 Project Phases Overview
5.1 PA/SI
5.2 RI/FS
5.3 Remedial Action
5.4 Example DQO
6 QC and Documentation
6 QC and Documentation Overview
6.1 Geophysical System Verification
6.2 QC Acceptance Requirements
6.3 Accreditation and Other Considerations
6.4 UFP-QAPP and Documentation
7 Acquiring Geophysical Data
7 Acquiring Geophysical Data Overview
7.1 Site Preparation
7.2 Geophysical Survey
7.3 Intrusive Investigation
8 Stakeholder Perspectives
8 Stakeholder Perspectives Overview
8.1 Community Involvement Plan
8.2 Using Public Service Announcements and the Media
8.3 Maintain Updated Stakeholder Notification and Communications
9 Case Studies
9 Case Studies Overview
9.1 Case Study 1: AGC Lessons Learned at the former Camp San Luis Obispo
9.2 Example Case Study 2: Soil Processing
Training Video
Additional Information
Appendix A. Root Cause Analysis/Corrective Action Process Summary
Acronyms
Glossary
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback
Quality Considerations for Multiple Aspects of Munitions Response Sites
HOME
Training Video
ITRC on Social Media
ITRC on Social Media